Answer. Assume n is my score and x is the maximum score
of any student in the class. Since I am a member of this class,
.
Equivalently
or
.
So
.
Thus the maximum contribution of the assignment to my final grade is
15.
(b) Prove that letting a friend copy your correct answer to a question may reduce the contribution of your own assignment to your final grade.
Answer. Proof by example. Let my friend currently have the maximum score, x, in class. Suppose I let him copy one of my correct answers and thereby increase his score to y > x, while my own score, n, remains unchanged. Then since y > x, 1/y < 1/x. Consequently, my new score, 15n/y < 15n/x, my old score.
Answer. Proof by contradiction. Suppose
is rational.
Then
for some integers a and b. Then by
definition of the logarithm,
3 = 2a/b giving 3b = 2a. But 2
and 3 are prime and so
for integer a and b. This
is a contradiction and so
must be irrational.
(Alternately, you could say the equality never holds because the RHS
is even and the LHS is odd
)
Answer. See the following table:
| u | v | w | x | ||||
| p | q | r |
|
|
|
|
|
| F | F | F | F | T | T | F | T |
| F | F | T | F | T | T | F | T |
| F | T | F | T | T | F | F | T |
| F | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| T | F | F | T | F | T | F | T |
| T | F | T | T | T | T | T | T |
| T | T | F | T | F | F | F | T |
| T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T |
Answer. Direct proof.
Answer. For all pairs of integers, there exists a number equal to their mean. (Or equivalent translation).
Answer.
where
is understood to stand for
the set of all real numbers. (Or equivalent translation. Note the
positioning of the brackets.)
Answer. (a) Let
.
Setting
n = 0, 1, 2, 3 gives the following simultaneous
linear equations:
| d | = | 3 | (1) |
| a+b+c+d | = | 13 | (2) |
| 8a + 4b + 2c + d | = | 34 | (3) |
| 27a + 9b + 3c + d | = | 70 | (4) |
Answer. (b)
Answer. Program:
main()
{
double sum1 = 0, sum2 = 0;
unsigned n, i;
for (n = 0; n < 10; n++) {
sum1 = sum2 = 0;
sum1 = 2.0/3.0 *n*n*n + 7.0/2.0*n*n + 35.0/6.0*n + 3;
for (i = 0; i <= n; i++)
sum2 += 2*i*i + 5*i + 3;
printf("n = %2d: By addition=%g and by formula=%g\n",
n, sum2, sum1);
}
} /* Or equivalent program */
Output:
n = 0: By addition = 3 and by formula = 3 n = 1: By addition = 13 and by formula = 13 n = 2: By addition = 34 and by formula = 34 n = 3: By addition = 70 and by formula = 70 n = 4: By addition = 125 and by formula = 125 n = 5: By addition = 203 and by formula = 203 n = 6: By addition = 308 and by formula = 308 n = 7: By addition = 444 and by formula = 444 n = 8: By addition = 615 and by formula = 615 n = 9: By addition = 825 and by formula = 825
Answer. Find the least n such that
.
Since
must be
,
i.e. not less than 1 followed by 999 zeros.
n-1 is thus the required number whose factorial has fewer than 1000
digits.
Answer. Assume the proposition is true for n. Then there are n(n-1)(n-2)/6 subsets of size 3 from a set of size n> 2. Consider a set of size n+1. The number of extra 3-element sets that can be formed is equal to the number of number of distinct 2-element sets that can be formed from the original n-element set since each of these can be combined with the new n+1st element. Thus the total number of 3-element subsets from the n+1-element set is ``n choose 2'' which is n(n-1)/2 plus n(n-1)(n-2)/6 (by the inductive hypothesis). This equals n(n-1)/2 + n(n-1)(n-2)/6 = (n+1)n(n-1)/6 = (n+1)(n+1-1)(n+1-2)/6 proving the hypothesis.
Answer. 1 (If your aim is to get a point), 0 (if your aim is to make a point), excuse the pun.
Answer. Clearly no. Consider the answer ``0'' to the previous question.